Ethical Guidelines of PVELL

Prism Voyage of English and Literature-PVELL preserves severe ethical guidelines. These are likewise addressed to the researchers, reviewers, and the journal's authoritative editorial board. The text frames a complete arrangement of ethical directions for professionals submitting their work to PVELL. These rules cover different parts of moral lead in examination and publication, guaranteeing the honesty and believability of the published work. Here is an outline of the central concerns from the instructions:

Novelty: PVELL only allows original work to be published in English language and literature. The submitted article ought not to be submitted or published somewhere else.
Copyright and Consents: Authors should regard copyright and get fundamental authorizations in any place required. On the off chance that it is observed that there is an infringement of copyrights, the editorial board of the journal preserves all authority to take required actions.
Material Use: Authors need approval to use third-party materials. Data and other facts used in the research should be included in the paper agreeing to permission to do so.
Consent: Authors should have proof of approval for utilizing names and affiliations.
Responsibility: The submitting writer and everyone agreeing to be co-writers of the article are answerable for the affluence.
Authorship: All critical contributors ought to be recorded as authors and minor supporters in acknowledgement.
Conflict of Interest: Any possible irreconcilable situation should be unveiled. The authors ought to give a disclaimer regarding the irreconcilable situation. Any infringement might prompt undesired actions against the authors.
Depository Limitations: Once published, manuscripts should be deposited in institutional repositories (not before that).
Unauthorized Circulation: Authors ought to keep others from electronically dispersing their paper.
Authorship Order: All contributors should agree on the order of authors. Any objection by any author should be made to the editorial board within the given time frame.
Review and Agreement: All authors must review and agree on the manuscript content.

The Correction Notices:

Errors and Omitting in Printing: Any mistakes or shortcomings in publishing are rectified and acknowledged. If necessary, some of these will be fixed in the articles that have been published.

Inaccuracy and Omitting in Writing: Writer mistakes are acknowledged and fixed. Before publication, the authors have the option to report any errors or omissions to the editorial board. The editorial board may consider the request if the paper is uploaded.
Retaining: Applied when serious unethical behaviour or false research exists. If there is evidence of serious misconduct or a transgression of the rules of ethics, the editorial board retains the right to retract a paper. The writers might be placed on a blacklist and barred from future journal publications.

Clarification Note: Used to make small clarifications without changing the text. The authors may include such notes on the paper's title page.

Expressions of Concern: Used when there are ambiguous findings or conflicts of interest.

Misdemeanours in Ethics:

Plagiarism: Plagiarism is not tolerated at all. Plagiarism is any copying or paraphrasing that is not strictly adhered to. Different actions result from the definition of distinct levels of plagiarism. A similarity index of no more than 19% is appropriate. It is the authors' responsibility to ensure that no similar text elements are plagiarized.

Originality Requirement: PVELL only accepts original manuscripts. By signing the consent form, the authors agree to these terms.
Minor Referencing Errors: Minor referencing errors include small text sections with 1 to 10 missing references or less than 10% copying of a single text. Such errors are considered the author's errors and may be corrected with the author's cooperation.
Major Copying Without Proper Citation: When more than 10% of a single text is copied without proper citation, this is considered major copying and will result in the manuscript being retracted. Proper referencing is crucial to prevent accusations of plagiarism.
Idea Copies: Although not recommended, idea copying is not considered plagiarism since ideas are not protected by copyright. With the author's consent, it might lead to a writing error or a note of clarification.
Inadequate Recognition: Inadequate recognition of the methodology, hypothesis, or cited work. Insufficient recognition results in a clarification note. It is imperative to emphasize the appropriate use of the referenced work to prevent misunderstandings.

Implications

Assures Originality: Preserves the honour of the journal by guaranteeing that every piece of work submitted is unique and hasn't been plagiarized.
Promotes Appropriate Citation: Stresses the significance of precise and comprehensive citations to eschew plagiarism and uphold academic integrity.
Encourages Ethical Research: Authors must conduct comprehensive literature reviews and appropriately cite pertinent works to promote an ethical research culture.
Redundant Publication: Repeated studies must yield fresh findings or original data. This section does, of course, highlight the significance of originality and appropriate attribution in research submissions to PVELL. The guidelines for repeated studies and their acceptance criteria are broken down as follows:

Novel or Unique Conclusions: Studies conducted again should only be approved if they produce novel or unique conclusions. It is insufficient to merely duplicate prior research without incorporating fresh perspectives.
Differentiated with New Data: New data or extra information must be used to distinguish the repeated study. It is unacceptable to repeat analyses or procedures using the same data merely.
Scope and Acknowledgment: If a study makes up less than 25% of the original manuscript and is properly acknowledged, it may be taken into consideration. In addition to making sure that the scope and conclusions of the repeated study differ significantly from the original, authors are required to acknowledge prior work.
Emphasizing Repetition: Make sure the submission clarifies where the repetition occurs. To ensure clarity, it might be necessary to include a note of clarification if the repetition needs to be sufficiently highlighted.
Copied Content and Retraction: Serious action is taken if more than 25% of the manuscript is retracted or improperly acknowledged as having been taken from a prior study without adding new conclusions.
Exactly copied text or several submissions:

Verbatim Copy: A retraction notice must be included if the manuscript replicates a previously published study.

Various Submissions: When a manuscript is simultaneously submitted to and published in another journal, a retraction notice is required (multiple submissions).
Authorship Issues: The order, inclusion, and exclusion criteria for authors are specified. These include recommendations for authorship disputes in manuscripts submitted to PVELL, which stress the significance of appropriately acknowledging contributors and resolving conflicts:

Criteria for Inclusion:

Significant Contribution: A list of authors who have contributed substantially to the research is required.
Acknowledgment: The acknowledgement section should include information about those who supported the research but did not directly contribute.

Types of Problems with Authorship:

Three primary types of authorship issues can occur:
Exclusion of a Contributor: Someone who contributed significantly is not included.
- Non-Contributors: People who did not add anything to the manuscript are included.
- Author Order: Differences in the authors' relative contributions and order of appearance.

PVELL's Role:

Assistance with Resolution: PVELL will make an effort to support the settlement of authorship disputes.
Pre-submission Research Process: Prior to manuscript submission, PVELL and its editors are unable to evaluate the degree of contribution made during the research process.

Modifying the Authorship:

Author's Error: It will be deemed an author's error if all authors consent to a modification of the authorship arrangement.
Retraction Notice: Only if requested by all participating authors will a retraction notice be published.
Consequences:
Guarantees Fair Credit: Accurate authorship attribution guarantees that those contributing get credit for their efforts.

Conflict Resolution: PVELL favours a just settlement of authorship disputes that honours the agreement of all parties.
Preserve Integrity: Open authorship procedures preserve the credibility of the scholarly community and published work.
Defamation/Libel: Defamatory statements are subject to retractions or corrections, and authors are required to substantiate their consent. These defamation and libel guidelines highlight the importance of communicating responsibly and courteously in submitted manuscripts:

Proof of Consent: For studies involving individuals or organizations, authors are required to furnish "proof of consent". This guarantees that subjects are treated ethically and guards against future defamation lawsuits.
Appropriate Interaction:

Unsubstantiated, Emotional, and Inaccurate Statements: PVELL will not accept statements about specific people that are unfounded, emotional, or inaccurate. Should such claims be discovered, authors might be contacted to revise the work or have the manuscript rejected.
Positive Reviews: Product and service reviews and critiques are permitted but must be positive and not harmful.

Retraction of Defamatory Statements:

Defamatory Statements: PVELL retains the right to take legal action if a published manuscript contains defamatory remarks about specific people or groups.
Retraction Notice: A retraction notice will be published if defamatory statements are found. The manuscript might be removed from the journal's online edition in extreme circumstances.
Apology: An apology acknowledging and correcting the defamatory statements will appear in a future issue of PVELL.

Implications

Ethical Treatment: Guarantees that published works handle people and organizations decently and ethically.
Preserves Journal Integrity: Preserves PVELL's integrity by ensuring that the published content is truthful, responsible, and devoid of defamation.
Encourages Constructive Discourse: To promote a positive academic environment, authors are encouraged to engage in constructive criticism instead of malicious attacks.
Fake Data: Cases are sent to the authors' respective institutions for processing.

This section discusses the problem of falsified data in PVELL submissions and describes the journal's position and procedures in such instances:

Initial Submission Conduct of Study: Prior to the manuscript being sent to PVELL, a study is carried out.
Editors' Limitations: If the study is pre-submitted, editors at PVELL might not be able to decide on every instance of falsified data.
Journal's Support and Referral: To the best of its abilities, PVELL will try to help resolve cases involving fabricated data. When necessary, PVELL will forward the issue to the writers' respective institutions for additional research.

Implications

Accountability: Writers are responsible for ensuring that the data they submit is authentic.
Journal's Commitment: PVELL is dedicated to treating instances of falsified data with gravity and propriety.
Institutional Involvement: In serious situations, involving the institutions of the writers guarantees a comprehensive and unbiased investigation.
Conflict of Interest: Any conflict of interest that arises may be resolved through disclosure; if one does not, legal action may be taken.
Conflicts of Interest Declaration: Authors, editors, and reviewers must disclose all conflicts of interest.
Types of Conflicts of Interest: Any financial or personal stake in the research findings.
Unidentified funding: Undisclosed financial support for the study provided by a third party with an interest.
Interest in Suppressing the Study: There is a financial and personal incentive to hide the results.
Declaration in Manuscripts: Before the manuscript goes through the review process, authors must include a note outlining any financial support from third parties or any other potential conflict of interest.
Disclosure of Potential Conflicts:
Reporting to PVELL: PVELL should be notified if a conflict of interest is suspected so that it can be looked into and appropriate action taken.
Issues Concerning Editors: You should bring up any issues regarding conflicts of interest with editors directly to PVELL's journal publisher.
Transparency: Provides openness and transparency throughout the entire research and publication procedure.
Prevents Bias: Prevents potential bias that might affect the publication process or the research results.
Preserves Journal Integrity: Treating conflicts of interest with gravity and impartiality preserves the integrity of the journal and the academic community.