Peer Review Process

Prism Voyage of English Language and Literature -PVELL

PVELL uses a strict double-blind review procedure to ensure that reviewers' and authors' identities are kept private during the assessment process. To preserve the anonymity of our review process, authors are respectfully asked to follow the specific instructions for manuscript preparation provided in our author's guidelines.

Through a double-blind review process, PVELL guarantees that the reputation or gender of the authors does not sway reviewers evaluating submitted abstracts. This method greatly lowers the possibility of biased assessments or challenges when assessing the work of well-known researchers in a particular field of study. Our dedication to double-blind reviewing eliminates such difficulties, which promotes an equitable and unbiased evaluation of each submission.

The board of editors of PVELL first screens the articles. A double-blind process is followed when a paper is sent to reviewers after it has been accepted for peer review. When deciding whether to accept an article for publication, the editorial board considers the reviewers' recommendations and lets the authors know about it. The conclusions include rejection, acceptance with significant changes, acceptance with minor changes, and acceptance without any changes.

The author(s) receive the recommendations from the peer reviewers and have a fair amount of time to make the necessary modifications. Following resubmission, the editorial team members verify that the suggested changes have been incorporated and/or forward the document to peer reviewers for feedback.

Following final acceptance, the articles are published online and accessed via the journal's website under the Current Issue heading, corresponding to the journal's specific volume and issue.